Parents should be able to send their children to schools that use tuition dollars for education instead of for superfluous projects. In public schools, tuition is paid for by taxpayers. That's why LPS feels obliged to email newsletters out to the public after school board meetings.

What do we make, then, of this excerpt from this week's school board meeting notes, sent out by LPS's public relations specialist Mary Kay Roth.

Let's unpack the positive spin on this "patron engagement program."

The Board of Education just approved a $300,000 contract for an online program that allows community members to get answers to their questions within two days. We can already get answers to our questions in less than two days by simply picking up the phone and calling them. LPS is not Apple or Toyota. It doesn't have millions of customers. In fact, there is one LPS employee for every 5 LPS customers. Answering questions should be easy. What we really want LPS to be focusing on is education, not the organization's image.

What did taxpayers just buy?
The main goals of ConnectNow are to increase public relations, collect data on community "questions and concerns" and presumably the question-askers, and create an "awareness system" (this double-speak is unclear). 

How do we taxpayers like this expense? LPS is spending $100,000 per year on this particular part of their branding (there is much more spent on their image in other ways). What could we do with that $100,000 per year if it were spent on education?

What could we have bought instead?
The local Catholic schools can educate 20 students all year long with $100,000. For students with special interests or who want to learn something at a faster pace, we could pay for 500 of them to take an online course through the accredited UNL Online High School with that $100,000. We could have bought 14,285 copies of To Kill a Mockingbird or interactive Promethean boards for 20 classrooms. Instead, LPS gets "a front door," according to their spokesperson.

It's no wonder LPS officials and teacher's union officers want to deny the opportunity of school choice to the people of Lincoln. This kind of behavior is doomed to failure in any kind of free market. Without the free market, the monopoly can spend our money on anything they want.

Florida's Tax Credit Scholarship offers funding for low-income students to attend private schools, similar to the Opportunity Scholarship legislation (LB 26) sponsored by Senator Bob Krist in Nebraska. In Florida, thousands of students (69,950 during the 2014-2015 school year) have been able to take advantage of the Florida Tax Credit and attend the school of their choosing, yet the state teacher's union is unhappy. 

The state teacher's union (FEA) sued the state in 2014, but a judge ruled that the union had no standing on its claims regarding the Florida Tax Credit Scholarship program. The union is now appealing the decision, sparking the #DropTheSuit "Rally in Tally," attended by some 10,000 students and parents. 

Around the country, hundreds of thousands of low-income students are making educational gains as they take advantage of innovative school choice options. So far, Nebraska's legislators have been unwilling to offer the same options to students in our state.

Nebraska School Choice Week (January 24-30) gave Nebraskans a great opportunity to discuss K-12 public education options currently available, including celebrating the great things we are currently doing, and identifying areas that need obvious improvements.  School choice advocates got a chance to highlight alternative education options to address those needed improvements in discussions about tax-credit scholarships, charter schools, educational savings accounts, and online learning.  
 
Like any public forum, there were dissenting opinions about school choice, and those arguments were strongly voiced during Nebraska School Choice Week in regards to expanding educational opportunities for parents and kids through options outside the control of the traditional public school administrative model.  In fact, the Nebraska teacher’s union spent thousands of dollars in persuasion polling and press conferences during Nebraska School Choice Week to ensure they would not lose influence with voters in Nebraska.
 
Despite the opposition's rhetoric, reasonable, forward-thinking parents want control and choice over their children’s educations, and they believe their zip code residence and their income level should not dictate those choices.  As communities from New Orleans to Milwaukee to Miami have learned, educational choice is an immediate solution for parents who have children who are trapped in underperforming traditional public schools.  In fact, 69% of Americans support school choice overall, according to a new national poll from the American Federation for Children, and 76% support public charter schools, with only 20% opposing them.   And like so many things in our American dream, having the opportunity to choose from options that meet the diverse needs of a diverse population makes parents and students more committed towards educational outcomes, more engaged to ensure their success, and more willing to change from the status quo to fit their unique family needs better. 

Indoor Plumbing: Change Can Be Difficult, But the Rewards Are Great
 
Let’s look at a simple analogy. Indoor plumbing was a big change for people all across the country. People had been living without indoor plumbing for millennia; they knew they could get along just fine without it. People also had vested interests in the way things had always been done. If there had been a privy builders union, you can bet they would have fought indoor plumbing tooth-and-nail. They would probably have told people indoor plumbing was dangerous and would result in nasty sewer backups (which actually does happen sometimes). But people here in Nebraska visited their relatives in Philadelphia or Chicago and came home thinking, “That indoor plumbing is pretty great.  My sister gets hot running water right in her kitchen.  My life would be easier and more efficient if I had that.” So they adopted indoor plumbing, and the privy builders learned that with advances in technology come even more job opportunities than they previously had. Of course, the courthouse in Frontier County, NE, was the last courthouse in the nation to get indoor plumbing, but if you visit that courthouse today, the drinking fountain works just fine.
 
Indoor plumbing is a nice luxury, but quality education shouldn’t been seen as a luxury, especially when children in the rest of the country already have the immense opportunities that come with school choice. By putting up roadblocks to school choice in Nebraska, we are preventing growth and innovation in our state. I’m not willing to move into a house without indoor plumbing, and likewise, there are many people who are not willing to move to a state without school choice.  Not when they have enjoyed it for a quarter of a century back home.

Learn the Facts About School Choice
 
Opponents to school choice are willing distort or avoid the facts in order to keep educational options out of Nebraska. They’ll tell you that charter schools are private schools. They’ll say that wealthy donors are trying to take over the school system. They’ll say school choice advocates have hidden agendas.
 
Just so you know, here’s the agenda of school choice supporters (we’ve never been shy about it):

• To expand educational options so each child can find the just-right academic fit
• To increase competition within the public school system so that all schools improve
• To give parents more control over their kids’ educations (since parents know their children better than anyone else)
• To use current state education funding in the smartest way for the highest academic outcomes garnered, and if possible, even reduce the taxpayer burden (charter schools and private schools spend less money to achieve equal or greater results than traditional public schools)

 
If you’re new to the subject of school choice, or have only heard one side of the story about it, check out the facts.  Talk to someone who came from a state that had school choice.  There are 25 years of school choice examples in the U.S – some good, some bad, and some great which is why it is still around.   In the last 10 years, 43 states have pin-pointed best practices in their school choice legislative bill writing.  The net effect is that school choice is expanding faster in states that already have it than legislative sessions can give yes votes to on Capitol floors.  And even though we are a late-adopter, Nebraska is in a position to cherry-pick those best practices to write legislation for our state that is the best for parents, students, teachers and taxpayers. 

There are more than a million children in this country on waiting lists for public charter schools.  Supply-and-demand economics is shifting public education into a free market competitive arena where the best choices thrive.  The days of the one-size-fits-all traditional bureaucratic public school monopolies cannot keep up with the innovation and academic outcomes of school choice options.  But we will never know until we try, Nebraska.  And hopefully we don’t fall too far behind before we do; we can still catch up.